sons and lovers.

we had to work on this piece of work for lit asp today. it was, in my opinion, one of the more interesting prose passages that i have seen. for those who have no idea what i am talking about, it is basically a passage which is filled to the brim with extremely sensual and sexually implicit language and imagery. it was fun talking to the guys about the passage, analysing it and coming to the conclusion that d.h. lawrence is a rather horny writer.

basically, the guys felt that the whole passage was rather sexual, with the exception of daryl of course, who felt that an essay based on the sexuality of the passage alone was rather risky. but what the hell, we guys believed that our conclusion was right since we most definitely were able to justify it.

on second thoughts though, we might just be dirty-minded bastards. haha.